Do you believe human nature is constrained or unconstrained?

Do you think Lenin was bad?

Do you suppose that the leaders of Social Justice genuinely believe in their ideology, or are they hipocrites who are just interested in their own power?

I would bring up if matter can not be created or destroyed how did it all get there? If even scientists now belive in intelegent design via simulation theory are you really going to say theres nothing to hold faith in when theres so very clearly SOME HIGHER POWER?

I personally don't believe there are any actually irreligious people. The folks I know who don't believe in god have mostly replaced it with progressivism.

I would remind them that most of their assumptions about how the world works and morality come from Christianity. Whether morality based on guilt, individualism, human rights, humanism, the idea of ​​progress...

Let them find there own path to the higher power.
When self proscribed secular aethiests have found a path to a higher power even if its under a different name I trust everyone to end up discovering "he who created the universe".

As Spinoza believed, God is all that exists, which extends across all dimensions and realities, this world is an integral part of that God, he would only wait for modern society to collide with the reality of this world, i.e. God.

Nothing because the law of history is that

The world turns a blind eye so long as we keep getting songs lol

Absolute monsters who deserve to have there reputation tarnished at least. They 100% have skills that are useful that will be hard to use in jail so not sure about locking them up but they are the worst of the worst.

There are probably millions of celebrities who do a lot worse in the US

What are you referring to?

Almost everything in history fails, so rejecting the institutions and traditions that brought our civilization to success, be it Christianity, capitalism, free market, meritocracy, science, traditional ethics is a recipe for disaster. So yes it is concerning.

How exactly is it declining?

I really dont think it is.
Its management isnt as good as it used to be.
But management is the only part I can think of thats gotten worse.
Its never been good at occupying land but it still should be amazing at takeing it.

Very easy. But I assume that mean how easy it is to get rich: very difficult nowadays without resorting to sketchy measures.

It is easier then last year

no, because if we do it will be in favor is useless psychaitry

Mental illness is usually caused by:

1. Lack of belief in something greater than yourself
2. Lack of sleep.
3. No/bad routine.
4. Bad diet/contaminated enviroment.

Prioritize mental health over what?

Yes. A firm yes. But they should not necessarily be strict, rather natural. We should not exclude people from a job based on their gender, instead letting gender roles naturally work and small exceptions arise. I think it is important to have cultural guidelines, but not be overly strict with them.
Men and women both have their respective roles and the expectation to hold them. But there will be minor deviations which are fine. (The slippery slope doesn't apply here, because there is a shared culture and tradition. I am not talking about a bugman society.)

Yes, mostly. My theory on the world is about 85% of people are pretty much normal on any given issue. If that holds true, roughly 85% of people will be happiest doing their best to live up to traditional gender roles.

It's also essential for the well being of children (and thereby the future of society) to grow up in stable 2 parent (of different sexes) households. Traditional gender roles do a remarkable job of creating that environment.

The target birthrate should be 3+ children per woman.

I give a lot of credence to Carl Benjamin's argument he makes at around the 7:30 mark of this video:
https://youtu.be/3Rlxk4oKGHM

Yes. 100%. It's in everyone's best interest.