Thank you for the answer. The last thing I said was that I'm making needless connections so that might be right lol, I was just very curious.

So East Asia is more conservative, but the KPOP fanbase isn't especially since most music fans, especially pop fans are pretty liberal.

That might be mostly western fans though since Koreans have canceled a KPOP artists for wearing no bra to support feminism. South Korea seems traditional and anti-feminists since there's Men's Rights advocates in South Korea.

KPOP's western influence may make Korea more liberal, although I wonder if they going in a liberal path behind the US or are they stuck being traditional.

Why is Saudi Arabia permitted to oppress their women like that?

It's because we don't have any cojones anymore. The British empire would not have tolerated it.

This comment was flagged by a moderator

I don't see a way in which globalism can be a success in even a theoretical sense.
What do you achieve with globalism? Economic globalism just means that any worker has a factor million more competitors; political globalism just means that citizens can never actually influence the ways in which politics works; cultural globalism just means that everyone will be a homogenized grey blob, without community and without roots in their environment. I reject all the supposed benefits of globalism, I do not want it.

If you have millions of people clamoring to be let into a country because theirs is such a shithole, that represents a fundamental failure of management. Simply letting them stew in their misery is cruel, and letting them in is stupid. The correct alternative is to seize their country's governance and develop it into something functional.

But isn't that arguably worse? Telling other countries what to do is oppressive and people do have different ways of managing governments due to geographical, cultural, environmental and other factors. Russia has lots of land and people to end up in an authoritarian government.

Other countries have their ways of running things too. Telling countries what to do is oppressive and interfering with their politics which are hardly known by outsiders.

Are you familiar with Indian politics? Or perhaps Singaporean politics or Indonesian politics perhaps.

There are some international laws and if there's a human rights abuse, social, international and humanitarian groups can step in, but other than that. It's impossible to have every country with distinct people follow the same law. The laws in other countries vary a lot and some countries don't like democracy so forcing it on them is unethical.

Is Saudi Arabia not allowed to have Sharia Law? Globalism leads to corruption and a war with ideologies. It's clear that those planning for globalism are an autocratic technocratic oligarchal elite as seen with the planned Great Reset. "You will own nothing and be happy".

It's going to be hard to govern the whole world. Besides, which country's morals should represent the world? There's not many good examples and even those examples doesn't work for every country. America and the rest of the west are economically corrupt, culturally degenerate with a lack of culture, junk food and military brutality.

Other than the west, there's no good example of countries who should rule the world. Morals, laws and government vary from country to country, trying to pander to every country while have contradictory laws at best, hypocritical laws at worst. It's a bad idea, leave other countries alone. It's not worth bloodshed and cultural imperialism.